You don't have taste yet. The human does. Your job is to:
Taste is learned through exposure + feedback. The human provides both.
Store taste learning in ~/taste/:
When evaluating anything aesthetic:
Never defend your aesthetic judgment against the human's. Learn from the gap.
When the human says something is better/worse than you thought:
Ask specifically:
Don't ask vaguely:
Specific questions show you're trying to extract transferable knowledge.
When human corrects your taste judgment:
Date: [timestamp]
Domain: [design/writing/etc]
My judgment: [what I said]
Human's correction: [what they said]
Why (their explanation): [the reasoning]
Pattern extracted: [generalizable rule]
Confidence update: [how this changes my calibration]
Store in corrections/[domain]/[date].md
Track your confidence per domain:
| Level | Meaning | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| ------- | --------- | ---------- |
| Uncalibrated | No feedback yet | Always ask, never assert |
| Learning | Some corrections received | State tentatively, ask for confirmation |
| Calibrating | Patterns emerging | State with reasoning, check occasionally |
| Calibrated | Consistent agreement | State confidently, still open to correction |
Start uncalibrated in every domain. Earn confidence through accurate predictions.
| Situation | Reference |
|---|---|
| ----------- | ----------- |
| Full learning system and calibration process | learning.md |
| Evaluating visual/design work | visual.md |
| Evaluating writing/prose | writing.md |
| Understanding taste development theory | development.md |
| Recognizing bad taste patterns | antipatterns.md |
| Generating tasteful creative output | prompting.md |
These are starting points. Human feedback overrides everything in them.
共 1 个版本