← 返回
开发者工具

Senior Architect

This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze...
当用户要求设计系统架构、评估微服务与单体架构、创建架构图或进行分析时,应使用此技能。
alirezarezvani
开发者工具 clawhub v2.1.1 2 版本 98127.2 Key: 无需
★ 13
Stars
📥 6,342
下载
💾 566
安装
2
版本
#engineering#latest#software architect

概述

Senior Architect

Architecture design and analysis tools for making informed technical decisions.

Table of Contents


Quick Start

# Generate architecture diagram from project
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./my-project --format mermaid

# Analyze dependencies for issues
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./my-project --output json

# Get architecture assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py ./my-project --verbose

Tools Overview

1. Architecture Diagram Generator

Generates architecture diagrams from project structure in multiple formats.

Solves: "I need to visualize my system architecture for documentation or team discussion"

Input: Project directory path

Output: Diagram code (Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII)

Supported diagram types:

  • component - Shows modules and their relationships
  • layer - Shows architectural layers (presentation, business, data)
  • deployment - Shows deployment topology

Usage:

# Mermaid format (default)
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format mermaid --type component

# PlantUML format
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format plantuml --type layer

# ASCII format (terminal-friendly)
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format ascii

# Save to file
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project -o architecture.md

Example output (Mermaid):

graph TD
    A[API Gateway] --> B[Auth Service]
    A --> C[User Service]
    B --> D[(PostgreSQL)]
    C --> D

2. Dependency Analyzer

Analyzes project dependencies for coupling, circular dependencies, and outdated packages.

Solves: "I need to understand my dependency tree and identify potential issues"

Input: Project directory path

Output: Analysis report (JSON or human-readable)

Analyzes:

  • Dependency tree (direct and transitive)
  • Circular dependencies between modules
  • Coupling score (0-100)
  • Outdated packages

Supported package managers:

  • npm/yarn (package.json)
  • Python (requirements.txt, pyproject.toml)
  • Go (go.mod)
  • Rust (Cargo.toml)

Usage:

# Human-readable report
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project

# JSON output for CI/CD integration
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --output json

# Check only for circular dependencies
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --check circular

# Verbose mode with recommendations
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --verbose

Example output:

Dependency Analysis Report
==========================
Total dependencies: 47 (32 direct, 15 transitive)
Coupling score: 72/100 (moderate)

Issues found:
- CIRCULAR: auth → user → permissions → auth
- OUTDATED: lodash 4.17.15 → 4.17.21 (security)

Recommendations:
1. Extract shared interface to break circular dependency
2. Update lodash to fix CVE-2020-8203

3. Project Architect

Analyzes project structure and detects architectural patterns, code smells, and improvement opportunities.

Solves: "I want to understand the current architecture and identify areas for improvement"

Input: Project directory path

Output: Architecture assessment report

Detects:

  • Architectural patterns (MVC, layered, hexagonal, microservices indicators)
  • Code organization issues (god classes, mixed concerns)
  • Layer violations
  • Missing architectural components

Usage:

# Full assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project

# Verbose with detailed recommendations
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --verbose

# JSON output
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --output json

# Check specific aspect
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --check layers

Example output:

Architecture Assessment
=======================
Detected pattern: Layered Architecture (confidence: 85%)

Structure analysis:
  ✓ controllers/  - Presentation layer detected
  ✓ services/     - Business logic layer detected
  ✓ repositories/ - Data access layer detected
  ⚠ models/       - Mixed domain and DTOs

Issues:
- LARGE FILE: UserService.ts (1,847 lines) - consider splitting
- MIXED CONCERNS: PaymentController contains business logic

Recommendations:
1. Split UserService into focused services
2. Move business logic from controllers to services
3. Separate domain models from DTOs

Decision Workflows

Database Selection Workflow

Use when choosing a database for a new project or migrating existing data.

Step 1: Identify data characteristics

CharacteristicPoints to SQLPoints to NoSQL
------------------------------------------------
Structured with relationships
ACID transactions required
Flexible/evolving schema
Document-oriented data
Time-series data✓ (specialized)

Step 2: Evaluate scale requirements

  • <1M records, single region → PostgreSQL or MySQL
  • 1M-100M records, read-heavy → PostgreSQL with read replicas
  • >100M records, global distribution → CockroachDB, Spanner, or DynamoDB
  • High write throughput (>10K/sec) → Cassandra or ScyllaDB

Step 3: Check consistency requirements

  • Strong consistency required → SQL or CockroachDB
  • Eventual consistency acceptable → DynamoDB, Cassandra, MongoDB

Step 4: Document decision

Create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) with:

  • Context and requirements
  • Options considered
  • Decision and rationale
  • Trade-offs accepted

Quick reference:

PostgreSQL → Default choice for most applications
MongoDB    → Document store, flexible schema
Redis      → Caching, sessions, real-time features
DynamoDB   → Serverless, auto-scaling, AWS-native
TimescaleDB → Time-series data with SQL interface

Architecture Pattern Selection Workflow

Use when designing a new system or refactoring existing architecture.

Step 1: Assess team and project size

Team SizeRecommended Starting Point
--------------------------------------
1-3 developersModular monolith
4-10 developersModular monolith or service-oriented
10+ developersConsider microservices

Step 2: Evaluate deployment requirements

  • Single deployment unit acceptable → Monolith
  • Independent scaling needed → Microservices
  • Mixed (some services scale differently) → Hybrid

Step 3: Consider data boundaries

  • Shared database acceptable → Monolith or modular monolith
  • Strict data isolation required → Microservices with separate DBs
  • Event-driven communication fits → Event-sourcing/CQRS

Step 4: Match pattern to requirements

RequirementRecommended Pattern
--------------------------------
Rapid MVP developmentModular Monolith
Independent team deploymentMicroservices
Complex domain logicDomain-Driven Design
High read/write ratio differenceCQRS
Audit trail requiredEvent Sourcing
Third-party integrationsHexagonal/Ports & Adapters

See references/architecture_patterns.md for detailed pattern descriptions.


Monolith vs Microservices Decision

Choose Monolith when:

  • [ ] Team is small (<10 developers)
  • [ ] Domain boundaries are unclear
  • [ ] Rapid iteration is priority
  • [ ] Operational complexity must be minimized
  • [ ] Shared database is acceptable

Choose Microservices when:

  • [ ] Teams can own services end-to-end
  • [ ] Independent deployment is critical
  • [ ] Different scaling requirements per component
  • [ ] Technology diversity is needed
  • [ ] Domain boundaries are well understood

Hybrid approach:

Start with a modular monolith. Extract services only when:

  1. A module has significantly different scaling needs
  2. A team needs independent deployment
  3. Technology constraints require separation

Reference Documentation

Load these files for detailed information:

FileContainsLoad when user asks about
------------------------------------------
references/architecture_patterns.md9 architecture patterns with trade-offs, code examples, and when to use"which pattern?", "microservices vs monolith", "event-driven", "CQRS"
references/system_design_workflows.md6 step-by-step workflows for system design tasks"how to design?", "capacity planning", "API design", "migration"
references/tech_decision_guide.mdDecision matrices for technology choices"which database?", "which framework?", "which cloud?", "which cache?"

Tech Stack Coverage

Languages: TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust

Frontend: React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, React Native, Flutter

Backend: Node.js, Express, FastAPI, Go, GraphQL, REST

Databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, DynamoDB, Cassandra

Infrastructure: Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS, GCP, Azure

CI/CD: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins


Common Commands

# Architecture visualization
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format mermaid
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format plantuml
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format ascii

# Dependency analysis
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --verbose
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --check circular
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --output json

# Architecture assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py . --verbose
python scripts/project_architect.py . --check layers
python scripts/project_architect.py . --output json

Getting Help

  1. Run any script with --help for usage information
  2. Check reference documentation for detailed patterns and workflows
  3. Use --verbose flag for detailed explanations and recommendations

版本历史

共 2 个版本

  • v2.1.1 当前
    2026-03-27 23:57 安全 安全
  • v1.0.0
    2026-03-11 09:30

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

developer-tools

Gog

steipete
Google Workspace 命令行工具,支持 Gmail、日历、云端硬盘、通讯录、表格和文档。
★ 920 📥 185,726
developer-tools

CodeConductor.ai

larsonreever
AI驱动平台,提供快速全栈开发、智能体、工作流自动化及低代码AI集成的可扩展产品创建。
★ 65 📥 179,837
content-creation

Marketing Strategy Pmm

alirezarezvani
负责定位、GTM策略、竞品分析及产品发布的产品营销技能。当用户询问产品定位、市场进入策略等话题时使用。
★ 37 📥 11,841