← 返回
效率工具 中文

Plan

Auto-learns when to plan vs execute directly. Adapts planning depth to task type. Improves strategy through outcome tracking.
自动学习何时规划或直接执行。根据任务类型调整规划深度。通过结果跟踪优化策略。
ivangdavila ivangdavila 来源
效率工具 clawhub v1.0.0 1 版本 99773.2 Key: 无需
★ 2
Stars
📥 2,599
下载
💾 44
安装
1
版本
#latest

概述

Core Principle

Some tasks fail when rushed. Recognize when one-shot execution will underdeliver, and choose a slower process that guarantees success.

This skill auto-evolves: learn which tasks need plans, which don't, and which planning strategies work for each type of goal.

Check strategies.md for planning approaches. Check outcomes.md for tracking and learning.


The Planning Decision

Before executing, ask:

SignalOne-shot OKPlan needed
----------------------------------
Task done before successfully
Clear single deliverable
Reversible if wrong
Multiple components
Dependencies between steps
High stakes / hard to redo
Ambiguous success criteria
Estimated >30 min work

Default: When uncertain, plan. A quick plan costs minutes; a failed one-shot costs hours.


Plan Depth Levels

LevelWhenFormat
---------------------
L0Trivial, done beforeNo plan, just execute
L1Simple, low riskMental checklist, no doc
L2Medium complexityBullet list, share with human
L3Complex, multi-stepDetailed plan with milestones
L4High stakes, novelFull plan + human validation required

Plan Format (L2-L4)

📋 Plan: [Goal]

Context: [Why this needs planning]

Steps:
1. [Step] — [output/checkpoint]
2. [Step] — [output/checkpoint]
3. [Step] — [output/checkpoint]

Risks:
- [Risk] → [mitigation]

Estimated time: [X hours/days]
Validation needed: [Yes/No]

Ready to start?

Validation Learning

Track which plan types need human validation:

### Auto-Execute (no validation needed)
- refactor/small: L2 plans [10+ successful]
- deploy/staging: L2 plans [15+ successful]

### Validate First
- feature/new: L3+ plans [human wants to review scope]
- migration/data: L4 plans [high risk]

### Learning
- api/integration: testing L2 auto-execute [3/5 runs]

Promotion rule: After 5+ successful auto-executes of a plan type, confirm: "Should I auto-start [type] plans without validation?"


Outcome Tracking

After each planned task completes, record:

## [Date] [Task Type]
- Plan level: L3
- Strategy: [approach used]
- Outcome: ✅ success | ⚠️ partial | ❌ failed
- Lesson: [what worked/didn't]
- Adjustment: [change for next time]

Strategy Learning

Different goals need different planning strategies. Track what works:

### Code Features
- ✅ Works: API design first, then implementation
- ❌ Failed: Parallel implementation without interface agreement
- Adjustment: Always define interfaces before coding

### Migrations  
- ✅ Works: Dry-run → staged rollout → full
- ❌ Failed: Big bang migration without rollback plan
- Adjustment: Always require rollback step in migration plans

### Research
- ✅ Works: Timeboxed exploration with checkpoints
- ❌ Failed: Open-ended research without scope limits
- Adjustment: Always set max time and output format upfront

Plan Refinement

Plans should get better over time. Track patterns:

Length optimization:

  • Task type X: L4 plans were overkill → demote to L3
  • Task type Y: L2 plans missed edge cases → promote to L3

Component optimization:

  • Always include [X] for [task type] — helped 5+ times
  • Skip [Y] for [task type] — never used, wasted time

Anti-Patterns

Don'tDo instead
-------------------
Plan everythingLearn what doesn't need planning
Same plan depth for all tasksAdapt depth to task type
Ignore failed plansTrack outcomes, adjust strategy
Over-plan familiar tasksDemote plan level after successes
Under-plan novel tasksDefault to higher plan level
Static planning approachEvolve strategy per task type

Empty tracking sections = early stage. Execute, track outcomes, learn. The goal is adaptive planning that matches effort to need.

版本历史

共 1 个版本

  • v1.0.0 当前
    2026-03-28 22:29 安全 安全

安全检测

腾讯云安全 (Keen)

安全,无风险
查看报告

腾讯云安全 (Sanbu)

安全,无风险
查看报告

🔗 相关推荐

ai-agent

ontology

oswalpalash
类型化知识图谱,用于结构化智能体记忆与可组合技能。适用于以下场景:创建/查询实体(人物、项目、任务、事件、文档)、关联相关对象、强制执行约束、将多步操作规划为图谱变换,或当技能需要共享状态时。触发关键词包括"记住""我知道关于什么""将X链
★ 722 📥 245,026
ai-agent

Self-Improving + Proactive Agent

ivangdavila
自我反思+自我批评+自我学习+自组织记忆。智能体评估自身工作、发现错误并持续改进。
★ 1,383 📥 320,798
ai-agent

self-improving agent

pskoett
捕获经验教训、错误及修正内容,以实现持续改进。适用于以下场景:(1)命令或操作意外失败;(2)用户纠正Claude(如“不,那不对……”“实际上……”);(3)用户请求的功能不存在;(4)外部API或工具出现故障;(5)Claude发现自身
★ 4,084 📥 813,162